Available now on Beta - This feature is in beta testing and will roll out to everyone soon.
Use Days on Site to see how long an asset has been assigned to its current project. It helps your team spot equipment that has been sitting too long and decide whether it should stay, move, or return.]
Days on Site shows how many days an asset has been at its current project. You can see this in Project Detail, and you can also add it as a column in the Asset Directory to review the number across the full fleet.
This is useful when equipment has been sitting at a jobsite longer than expected. Instead of guessing, your team can quickly see which machines may be underused or forgotten.
This feature is useful for teams that need a clearer view of where equipment is sitting and how long it has been there. It gives dispatch, project, and fleet teams a simple way to review jobsite allocation without opening multiple screens.
You can check Days on Site from either the project record or the Asset Directory. One view shows the number inside a single project, while the other helps you compare assets across the full fleet.
Go to Projects in the sidebar and open the project you want to review. In the asset section, each assigned asset shows its current Days on Site value. This makes it easier to spot equipment that has been sitting longer than expected.
Go to Directory → Assets and open the column settings. Turn on the Days on Site column, then sort the list in descending order to find the assets that have been on a project the longest.
This works especially well if your team already uses Assigning Assets to Projects and the Asset Directory to manage jobsite assignments and equipment movement.
This feature is available in the web app and is based on the asset’s current project assignment. The number updates automatically as assignments change, so the count reflects how long the asset has been tied to that project.
A quick review of Days on Site can help your team make better decisions about transfers, rental use, and equipment planning. It is most useful when reviewed regularly instead of only after a project starts running short on equipment.